§ Speed & Reliability / Core Web Vitals

LCP, INP, CLSall in thegood zone.

Google ranks pages by their real-user experience. We push every vital into the good band and keep it there with continuous monitoring — because every millisecond is felt.

Fix our Core Web Vitals→← Back to Speed & Reliability
§ Core Web Vitals — Field data (28 d)
0.1s
LCP · ≤ 2.5 s
0ms
INP · ≤ 200 ms
0.02
CLS · ≤ 0.1
AssessmentAll metrics: Good
§ Filmstrip — Progressive render

Every frame counts

The load filmstrip shows what your users see — frame by frame from first byte to fully painted. We optimise the 0→LCP window first.

LCP1.1s

The hero image renders in 1.1 s — well inside the 2.5 s good zone.

INP120ms

Every tap, click and keystroke paints a response within 120 ms.

CLS0.02

Fonts and images reserve their space — the layout never jumps.

§ Load filmstrip — 0 → 1.2 s
0msRequest
90msFCP
480msLayout
820msImages
LCP
1100msLCP
1200msIdle
§ Impact — Why CWV matters

Ranking is performance

Bounce rate drop
0%
after LCP fix
Conversion lift
0%
CLS eliminated
Search rank gain
0 positions
page-experience signal
§ Process — How we fix CWV

Field data, not lab guesses

01

Field data audit

We pull your CrUX data for the last 28 days — real users on real devices, not lab simulations.

02

Lab profiling

WebPageTest, Lighthouse and Chrome DevTools run in parallel — each reveals a different class of issue.

03

Fix & ship

Image optimisation, font strategy, interaction deferral, layout reservation — implemented and A/B verified.

04

Continuous monitoring

RUM (Real User Monitoring) keeps the numbers honest — alerts fire if a deploy regresses a metric.

Google is grading your UX
right now.

We read your CrUX data, find the metric lagging behind and implement the fix — field-verified with real-user monitoring.

Start a project→